Compositions

Can I ask you a question? Part 2

Can I ask you a question?

I love questions but that one sounds a little funny.

No, you can’t but you just did so—yes.

I joke but questions are important and sometimes people don’t always feel welcome to ask them. This is the 2nd in a 3 part series on asking questions.

Facing the students the teacher does stand,
The student facing the front raises her hand,
The answer not known, the teacher must learn,
To the front of the classroom she too does turn,
In humility she does lead learning’s way,
By heading into the unknown path and the fray,
Let us search out together the why,
From the dark unknown let us not shy,
The classroom now in shadow does fade,
“Further up and further in!’  she does bade.”

Some act as though questions about faith equal doubt at best or hearsay at the worst. I discussed the “at worst” part in my last post:  Here I believe that asking questions is necessary part of all learning. There is a philosophy of education, called Classical Education, that suggestions there are three stages of all learning.

The first stage is the Who, What, When, Where Stage. It is the stage of basic facts and rules. It is the memorization stage. Small children are often very good with this stage and can learn all manner of facts without understanding the information they are reciting. This early stage of acquiring facts is typically called the Grammar Stage.

playing game power strength
Photo by Public Domain Pictures on Pexels.com

When I first learned how to play chess, I was able to quickly learn all the pieces and their moves. Yet I didn’t know how to play the pieces together with any kind of strategy.

The 2nd stage of learning is the Why Stage. It is when the person begins to put things together, make connections between the facts, and challenge. Ever been around a preteen or teen who starts to argue with you about everything? That’s this stage. As even as an adult when we are presented to new information we do tend to ask question details fit the new information with what we already know. This is called the Dialectic stage. This stage is when you are synthesizing what you know. You see two facts and understand why they fit. No longer is it good enough to know both facts, but now you question WHY are these to facts able to both be true.

two person playing chess
Photo by rawpixel.com on Pexels.com

At some point I looked at the chess board and instead of seeing individual pieces I saw that each piece depended on the others.  I realized needed to use there individual traits together in order to win.

The last stage of learning is the HOW? It’s the put it into practice stage. It’s when a person can teach it, explain it or do it. It’s when you have made a recipe so many times you know how to change it when you don’t have all the ingredients, it is knowing how to play a game so well you can strategize, it’s the you know it so well you can use it to create something new. This stage is the Rhetorical stage. It’s the sage of learning that we all want to get to when we start out. It is when the learning of something finally gets to be fun because you can really do it! Before you were just practicing for the race, now you get to race.

grayscale photography of chessboard game
Photo by Felix Mittermeier on Pexels.com

As far as chess goes, I really haven’t ever gotten to this place. I of course can explain the rules and I can play and still have fun, but far less experienced players are able to beat me.

Do you see the pattern Knowledge, Understanding then Wisdom? You can’t start with basic knowledge and skip right to wisdom, there HAS to be a place for gaining understanding and questioning the WHY? Push the limits—playing chess? Loose a few key pieces and lose the game; Cooking a recipe—add a new ingredient—and it tastes terrible. You’re a kid questioning rules—its possible you break a few – and get yourself in a great deal of trouble. There is just no replacement for this important stage. And its no good staying in the first one forever.

In the context of religion, what kind of faith is that? In the context of any human being, what kind of adult is that?

I picture it like this. Say you had to repel off a cliff. It doesn’t matter if you are afraid of heights or not; you probably are going to check all the straps and all the gear. You must make sure it is strong and secure and make sure it isn’t going to slip or snap or break.
Does this mean you doubt? It might, it might also be an important part of checking the gear.
If you are the teacher being asked all the difficult questions it might be little uncomfortable. However, maybe the student is just testing the gear. Asking questions is a vital part of learning anything and it is a vital part of growth spiritually. Without it, we are stuck back in the first stage with a lot of knowledge that we really won’t know how to use, or how to apply it.

This Philosophy of Learning or Education may help explain human learning, but it does not inform on a topic, it only gives us a frame work for learning about that topic. In order to learn about theological questions we will need to look at Spiritual texts on faith and God. In my next post I will discuss this topic from a few passages from the Bible.

“Further up and Further in” is a reference from C. S. Lewis’ The Last Battle. 

Please like , share, and comment what your thoughts and questions are. You can also find Rough Draft ¶aragraphs on its Facebook page:https://www.facebook.com/J.A.Goggans

Compositions

Can I ask you a question? Part 1

Can I ask you a question?

I love questions but that one sounds a little funny.

“No, you can’t ask me a question but you just did so—yes.”

I joke but questions are important and sometimes people don’t always feel welcome to ask them. This is part 1 of a 3 part series about asking difficult questions and how we should treat those who are asking them.

My father loves the show Jeopardy. Growing up, family schedule and plans were often made around when the show aired. In a time before cell phones I even at times got a phone call from my dad asking me to record it (on a VHS tape) so he could watch it when he got home. Now my parents have a DVR, thankfully. The trick about Jeopardy is that contestants are already given the answer and they must come up with the question. Maybe, its being raised on Jeopardy but to this day, I’m always trying to think of questions while everyone else is trying to find answers.

I am encouraged when someone asks tough questions about struggles over difficult concepts regarding faith. I do not often feel condemned for asking them. However, I have observed a different experience. I have watched from afar (afar being on the internet world) and in person those who were asking questions about faith and Christianity. It seemed to me that some Christians (certainly not all but some) were uncomfortable having a “Questioner” in their midst. Either they treated the person as if they were heretic, or they were their evangelical project. Sometimes they swung back and forth between the two extremes and both made the “Questioner” feel even more out of place and not accepted. I even know someone who was told they weren’t allowed to ask any more questions during the meeting time. The individual felt very unwelcome after that, and eventually stopped going to the Bible study.

Some act as though that questions about faith equal doubt at best or hearsay at the worst. While others believe that such questions are vital to understanding faith and spiritual growth allowing a person to go from a place of doubt to a place of peace. I personally believe that asking questions is necessary for spiritual growth for many reasons, but I will focus on three:

  • An appeal from logic.
  • An appeal from philosophy of learning
  • An appeal from the Bible

Some act as though that questions about faith equal doubt at best or hearsay at the worst. I will tackle that “at worst” scenario first. According to Merriam-Webster online dictionary heresy is–

a : adherence to a religious opinion contrary to church dogma Continue reading “Can I ask you a question? Part 1”

Compositions

Joy, Peril, and Eternity

Have you ever wondered if there is a story—an exciting adventure for example—where there was no trouble? No one writes the “happily ever after” part of the story because what’s there to tell? What good story doesn’t have a bad problem for a hero to face? Isn’t that odd that our good stories must have something bad? We never think of problems in real life as an opportunity, yet without the problem would there even be a hero?

infinity
by J. A. Goggans

 

One energy sapping afternoon that had been filled with dread and high adrenaline, I began to ponder if I would be so soul tired if I were motivated by joy instead of fear? My thoughts turned to eternity in Heaven and considered how joy might be what sustains us for eternity. Much like Bilbo, after having unnaturally long life, who can fathom living in eternity without turning into

“too little butter spread over too much bread?”

Fear in the moment of real danger saves us, but over time fear cripples us with weakness. Fear is necessary in a world with peril. Joy, however, strengthens us when we are weak.  In eternity we will no longer have a mortal body that survives through fear and adrenaline response. Could our eternal strength be joy—powerful, pure, perfect joy?

When my son was about two he tripped, as toddlers do. I waited for the inevitable cry, but instead he laughed. As we walked on he clearly was trying to repeat the experience. He began to look for better ways to experience that feeling again by jumping off things.
Everything.
All the time.
He wanted to scare himself. Joy radiates from him and he bounds with energy and sunshine. Is this the foolishness of a child or does this show something of the faith of a child?

I grew up in a home averse to risk. Then I grew up and met risk takers—people who get out of bed because life is full of risk and a little bit of hope. I think I am raising one those people. When I think of peril, I think a bit of my son jumping. But instead of jumping off the deck, its like jumping off a cliff. It is ultimate risk and danger hanging in the balance and there is this moment where you have no idea what will happen that second your feet leave the ground.

As small kids my best friend and I had this theological debate. I said, “If we fell off a cliff in Heaven, we wouldn’t get hurt.” And she would always inform me, “There are no cliffs in Heaven.” She was afraid of heights, so I suppose in her mind horrible cliffs could not possibly be there.

Sometimes I think we look at Heaven like a place where nothing will really happen.
Not something to really look forward to.
A happy place but not motivating.
If you told my little boy he could jump but there wouldn’t be any risk, he might find it a little boring. Maybe he would like it at first but after a while he would look for something else dangerous.

Maybe something in the childhood debate about cliffs makes me ask, “Could eternity be like peril?” Not that it IS perilous, certainly not in a terrible way because Heaven is a place with no tears or pain. Peril would no longer be bad because of the joy strengthening us. Could even peril be redeemed?

Could eternity be a bit like the joy in an adventure story? However, not like any adventure we ever read about because we haven’t read an adventure story without a problem to overcome. Could it be a story of The Happily Ever After, authored by the Hero himself? If so it would not be our best story, it would be a perfect one.

Copyright J. A. Goggans 2018

Please like , share, and comment what your thoughts and questions are.
You can also find Rough Draft ¶aragraphs on its Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/J.A.Goggans

Compositions

A Question of Character

I have a hard time imagining different characters in my stories. I have the story line but not always strong differences in characters. I was thinking that maybe that is ok.  I’m not sure that the characters in the Chronicles of Narnia are all that different, and C. S. Lewis is my hero. What really is the difference between Jill and Eustace, Polly and Digory, and Shasta and Aravis?

I was thinking that Jane Austen has great characters. The characters in Emma are all so different and I feel like I know who each of them is. While each of her plots have strong similarities there are significant differences in her heroines Emma Woodhouse and Elizabeth Bennet. While there are certain over laps in different characters between novels there are such a variety of vivid characters that feel so real. It feels as though I have met them.

The difference between Lewis and Austen is that I feel more like I identify with the different questions and choices of the characters of Lewis where as I feel like I am watching all the characters play out in front of me in Austen’s novels.

That got me to wondering, is that why I like most of the movie adaptations of Austen’s novels but am disappointed with the Chronicles of Narnia.  If you cut out change something in Narnia, you mess it all up. If some scenes are cut and a few events changed here and there in an Austen novel, you still have all the lovely characters.

Is it possible to portray the character intricacies like Austen while developing the deep questions and ideas of Lewis?
Copyright 2018 J. A. Goggans

Please like , share, and comment what your thoughts and questions are.
You can also find Rough Draft ¶aragraphs on its Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/J.A.Goggans